We first wrote 上 this topic nearly a year ago[1]. Since then, courts have had an opportunity to interpret some of the provisions of the federal Defend 合法赌场澳门秘密s Act (DTSA). Indeed, since it was signed into law, more than 360 DTSA claims have been filed, with more than 343 complaints filed in federal court. … 继续阅读
Although some version of the Uniform 合法赌场澳门秘密s Act (“UTSA”) has widely been adopted by most states, including California, variations among the versions 和 related judicial interpretation has led to uncertainty—particularly in today’s interstate economy where trade secrets 和 misappropriation easily may cross multiple states.… 继续阅读
在爱德华兹诉亚瑟·安徒生案中,加利福尼亚最高法院重申了加利福尼亚’强有力的公共政策,禁止盟约不参与竞争。爱德华兹的主要问题是第九巡回赛’s "narrow restraint" exception was a proper interpretation of California law. Under the 狭窄的约束 exception, employers could enforce noncompetition agreements that did not "entirely preclude" an … 继续阅读